Search Results | Schmidt Kramer

1662 Results found.

Lancaster Crash Injures At Least 2 People

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/car-accident-in-city-of-lancaster-injures-at-least-2-people-police-investigating-20121129.html

Posted on Nov 29, 2012 Two people were injured and a third was treated for an anxiety attack after a two-vehicle crash Wednesday in Lancaster city, police said. The accident occurred at North Queen and East New streets around 3:20 p.m. One vehicle reportedly flipped upon impact, according to city police Lt. Michael Bradley. Bradley […]

Trial Lawyers Respond To Unfair Attack On Victim Rights

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/trial-lawyers-respond-to-unfair-attack-on-victim-rights.html

Last weekend the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran an article about changing venue for only victim lawsuits in Pennsylvania. The trial lawyers organization was never contacted before the story ran or asked to comment. Below is the response letter to the editor printed in today’s Pittsburgh Post- Gazette by Pennsylvania Association for Justice’s President and Schmidt Kramer Injury […]

Hanover Man Seriously Injured In Tractor Trailer Accident In South Central Pennsylvania

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/hanover-man-seriously-injured-in-tractor-trailer-accident-in-south-central-pennsylvania-20121129.html

Posted on Nov 29, 2012 An 81-year-old Hanover man was taken to York Hospital Tuesday night with moderate injuries after his car collided with a tractor-trailer on Baltimore Pike in West Manheim Township. Carroll Rohrbaugh Jr. was driving southbound in a 2009 Nissan sedan at about 9:30 p.m. when his car struck the mid-trailer area […]

Court Holds That Trailed Vehicle Is A “Motor Vehicle” For Insurance Purposes

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/couts-holds-trailed-vehicle-is-a-motor-vehicle-for-insurance-purposes.html

Below is the link to the Superior Court opinion from November 27, 2012 in Barnes v. Keller, — A.3d — (Pa. Super. Nov. 28, 2012) which reverses a Judge Tereshko Order which determined that a person was not entitled to uninsured (UM) motorist coverage when they were struck by an unidentified vehicle while they are […]

Social Security Administration Reduces Office Hours Due to Budget Cuts

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/social-security-administration-reduces-office-hours-due-to-budget-cuts-20121128.html

Posted on Nov 28, 2012 Disabled and elderly Americans regularly visit one of 1,500 U.S. Social Security field offices to meet with caseworkers, apply for benefits, and get answers to their questions. Beginning November 19, the Social Security Administration will shorten the service window during which agency employees are available to meet with the public. […]

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules On 402A Defense Of Highly Reckless Conduct In Strict Liability

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/pennsylvania-supreme-court-rules-on-402a-defense-of-highly-reckless-conduct-in-strict-liability.html

Posted on Nov 27, 2012 Attached are the links to the Majority, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 28 WAP 2011 (Pa. Nov. 26, 2012) relating to the applicability of a defense of the plaintiff’s highly reckless conduct in a products liability 402A case. The Majority […]

Get Ready For Winter Driving In Central Pennsylvania

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/get-ready-for-winter-driving-in-central-pennsylvania.html

How can you make your commute and driving safer in the snow? What tips or advice can you give to fellow drivers, especially if they are involved in a Harrisburg car accident as a result of ice or snow in Central Pennsylvania? “Make sure you leave extra time to get to work,” is top on […]

Regular Kidney Health Screening a Must for At-Risk Individuals

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/regular-kidney-health-screening-a-must-for-at-risk-individuals.html

According to the National Kidney Foundation, 26 million Americans are living with chronic kidney disease and millions more are at risk. Individuals most at risk for kidney disease include those with diabetes, high blood pressure or family history of kidney disease. Because a person can have kidney disease and not have any symptoms, regular kidney […]

Safety Tips For Driving In Snow

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/safety-tips-for-driving-in-snow-20121126.html

Posted on Nov 26, 2012 The Harrisburg area and all of Central Pennsylvania are expecting the season’s first snowfall tonight. From this experience, here are some snow driving tips the average driver can follow to reduce the chances of a crash. Get a grip. To have adequate snow traction, a tire requires at least 6/32-inch […]

Deer Hunting Rule Number 1 – Safety First

https://www.schmidtkramer.com/blog/deer-hunting-rule-number-1-safety-first.html

We all know that many people are unfortunately injured this time of year in Pennsylvania car accidents. However, many others are too often injured doing something they love, and that is hunting. Some safety measures can minimize the risk of an injury while hunting deer this year. Do you have any others? The Pennsylvania Game […]

Free Case Review

No Upfront Fees

Recent Results

$10,043,952.13 Personal Injury
Schmidt Kramer, P.C.partner Gerard C. Kramer won a personal injury action for $10,043,952.13 in Northumberland County on behalf of a volunteer firefighter who was the victim of Intentional Tort. The 50-year-old volunteer firefighter was seriously injured when a barn collapsed, causing a spinal injury which left him a paraplegic. The claim was brought against the arsonist who intentionally started the fire. It is believed that the verdict is the highest ever in Northumberland County.
View Results
$4,034,000.00 Personal Injury
Yesterday a Judge in Union County (Lewisburg, PA) awarded a couple from New Berlin, Pennsylvania, over $4,000,000 because the husband was shot while turkey hunting.You might ask yourself, how does a turkey hunting accident end up with that type of verdict? In order to understand the verdict you would have to know our clients. They are good people who had their life wrecked. Plus, you would have to know the defendant, who should not have been hunting with a gun because he was prohibited after a previous criminal conviction.It is a good verdict, because the Judge was able to do two things with his decision. First, he communicated to two very good people that their losses were something that those of us on the outside could appreciate and value. Mike Hobbins (our client) is a 51 year old guy who lost his sight because a convicted felon --who should not have even possessed a gun-- went hunting illegally, and broke with impunity the most fundamental rule in hunting: identify your target before you pull the trigger. The Judge accepted the financial loss Mr. Hobbins' suffered, but listened closely to the evidence of less tangible losses. When Mike broke down on the stand, because his daughter would end up walking him down the aisle at her wedding, as opposed to how it was supposed to go, the Judge was listening. When Mike could not keep it together, because of how emasculating it was for him not to be able to provide financially for his family, the Judge was listening. It was facts like these that the Judge cited to support the $2,000,000 award for non-economic damages. Second, the Judge wanted to send a message. Union County is a hunting county. Many of the residents hunt there, and people from outside the area come to Union County to hunt. It was my impression, from the Judge's statements as he rendered his decision, that he wanted to send a message to the people in Union County to protect them in their sport. The rules in place to restrict people convicted of crimes not to have a gun are not to be broken. Hunting is serious and you have to identify your target before you shoot. When you turn your back on the rules that are set to provide safety in a sport, you risk being an example. Here, the $1,000,000 punitive damage award sends that message loud and clear.When it really comes down to brass tacks, the right action was taken against a Defendant who may never truly appreciate what kind of impact his reckless choices caused.At Schmidt Kramer, we are injury lawyers. That means we work with people who were hurt in car accidents, who were hurt by the neglect of nursing homes, or those that were seriously injured because of the reckless, thoughtless acts of others. If you or a loved one have been injured in Pennsylvania, we may be able to help. While the verdict yesterday is not one that is representative of every case we do, it does show that serious and dedicated representation can bring good results.Joe ChapmanJanuary 18, 2013
View Results
$2,200,000.00 Auto Accidents
On Monday, January 6, 2014, Schmidt Kramer accident lawyer Scott Cooper obtained a verdict on behalf of his client who is the widow of a man who died in a fiery crash on Interstate 78 in Lebanon County. The awarded verdict of $2.2 million was in a nonjury proceeding before a federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. That verdict includes $100,000 in punitive damages assessed against the owner of the trucking company.Kamilah Claxton won summary judgment in November after the defendants, Sukhwinder Singh and the trucking company for which he worked, failed to file a brief in opposition to Claxton's motion, which was made in September. The verdict in Claxton v. Singh was issued after the court held a non-jury assessment of damages earlier this month."Mr. Sukhchan Singh, the employer, is liable on the basis of respondent superior, but was also grossly negligent in failing to maintain his vehicle in compliance with state and federal law, particularly with regard to having required safety inspections and correcting defects in its braking equipment," said U.S. District Judge William W. Caldwell of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in his opinion accompanying the verdict."He was also grossly negligent in entrusting his vehicle to Sukhwinder Singh, an inexperienced truck driver who had failed the written test and driving test multiple times before finally earning his commercial driving license," Caldwell said.
View Results
$1,200,000.00 Personal Injury
A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.2012-06-26 10:00:00 AMDate of Verdict: June 19. 2012Court and Case No.: C.P. Dauphin County No. 2009-CV-14003-MMJudge: Scott EvansType of Action: Medical malpracticeInjuries: Anoxic brain injuryPlaintiffs Counsel: Terry S. Hyman, Schmidt Kramer, HarrisburgPlaintiffs Experts: Dr. Anna H. Messner, liability; Lucille Packer, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Palo Alto, Calif.; Terry P. Leslie, vocations and earning capacity, Lancaster; Dr. Hilary B. Berlin, pediatric psychiatry, Great Neck, N.Y.Defense Counsel: Andrew H. Foulkrod, Darlene K. King, Foulkrod Ellis, Camp Hill, PADefense Experts: James C. Reilly, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Wilmington, DEComment: A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.The entire verdict came against Dr. Andrew M. Shapiro, the doctor who plaintiffs Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Metz alleged chose to have the boy monitored at a pediatric ward. The plaintiffs argued Shapiro failed to tell nurses caring for the baby about, and how to care for, the boy's enhanced risk for respiratory failure.The jury came back on June 19 and awarded Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Mets $500,000 in non-economic damages and $686,170 in loss of future earning capacity, according to the plaintiffs counsel.According to the statement, the baby's mother brought him to Shapiro because she was "'afraid that he might stop breathing during his sleep,'" the plaintiffs' pretrial statement said. Shapiro performed a sleep study and observed the baby's Apnea Hypopnea Index to be 43 — four times higher than what's considered severe. A tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were performed.According to the plaintiffs, the baby's sleep study results put him at an increased risk for post-operative respiratory complications. Despite this, they argued in the statement, Shapiro ordered the pediatric nurses at the Harrisburg Hospital general pediatric ward to observe the boy as they would any other patients — about once every four hours.The pretrial statement said that one in four children who have an AHI in the 40s and oxygen desaturation below 80 have some type of respiratory problem. The younger the child, the greater the risk of a respiratory problem, the statement said.According to the statement, Shapiro took off the child's pulse oximeter, the finger-mounted device used to measure blood oxygen, and ordered a heart and respiratory rate monitor. The child was 11 months old at the time.The plaintiffs pled that the baby was last seen at 4 a.m. There was no record of his oxygen saturation for the next hour and 45 minutes. He stopped breathing a 6:40 a.m., and his brain was without oxygen long enough to cause demonstrable injury on an MRI."Immediately prior to his surgery, [the child] was a normal child, who could say mama, eat finger foods, and was just on the verge of walking," the statement said. "After his code, [he] was like a newborn. He could not lift his head or sit up. He could not talk. He could not move."In his pretrial statement, Shapiro argued that he recognized the child's pre-operative sleep study showed he was driven to breath by decreased blood oxygen saturation, which he said was typical in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.He argued the American Academy of Otolaryngology dictates that admission to the intensive care unit is not the standard of care. In the statement, he said nurses did not observe signs of respiratory distress. No alarms sounded until the child arrested, the statement said.He said the baby likely arrested as a result of hypoglycemia and/or an acute aspiration, which he argued would not have been identified by blood oxygen saturation.— Ben Present, of the Law Weekly
View Results
$1,024,040.80 Auto Accidents
Scott Cooper settled a wrongful death case on behalf of the widow of a police office who was killed in a car accident in the line of duty for $1,024,040.80. The claim against the other driver was amicably resolved before suit was filed for the entire available policy limits for the other driver. The case took place in Adams County, PA.
View Results

Testimonials

After being in an automobile accident , Scott Cooper came highly recommended to me. I found Scott and his team very kind and considerate. Scott took time to explain the whole process to me and got me a settlement in a timely manner. I couldn't ask for best representation.
Ruthie Lupfer
Great Experience and Great results.. I recommend!!
Aaron Marquis
Scott Cooper and Jessica Vizcaino did great. They had good communication, follow-up and fought for me. They handled my case professionally and swiftly, especially with me being out of state. 5 stars all the way and I am glad that they represented me.
David Hawash
Greg W
Badreddine Saadoune