Motorcycle Accidents Blog Category

Third Circuit Panel Bars Motorcycle Insurer from Denying Additional Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on July 16, 2021 in Motorcycle Accidents

On Wednesday, Pennsylvania’s Third Circuit ruled that a precedent set by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court barred National General insurance Co. from denying additional underinsured motorist benefits to a motorcyclist who was injured in a crash. The motorcycle was covered by a different insurance company, and National General wanted to use a household vehicle exclusion to […]

What You Need to Know About Motorcycle Bias and How it Can Affect Injury Claims

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on June 29, 2021 in Motorcycle Accidents

Everyone has biases, just as everyone has opinions. Unfortunately, peoples’ biases and opinions about motorcycles and motorcycle riders often tend to lean one way. Insurance companies, juries and judges tend to view motorcycles as inherently dangerous and riders as reckless, dangerous individuals. Sometimes these biases are based on real-world experiences. For example, some people who […]

How do Motorcycle Accident Claims Differ from Car Crash Claims?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on August 12, 2020 in Motorcycle Accidents

Even though motorcycles and cars are both motorized vehicles, there are some significant differences between them, particularly when these vehicles are involved in accidents. Not only are injuries from motorcycle crashes often more significant than injuries from car accidents, recovering compensation after a motorcycle crash can be more complicated. If you were injured in a […]

Is Lane Splitting Legal in Pennsylvania?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on November 14, 2018 in Motorcycle Accidents

Lane splitting can result in a more serious accident compared to other types of motorcycle maneuvers. This maneuver may be used by motorcycle riders, but most states prohibit it. If you believe that lane splitting impacted your accident, the dedicated Harrisburg motorcycle accident lawyers at Schmidt Kramer can help. We can discuss the Pennsylvania lane splitting […]

How to Avoid Blind Spots on a Motorcycle

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on June 11, 2018 in Motorcycle Accidents

Many accidents are caused when other motorists do not observe motorcyclists due to their smaller size and more narrow profile. If a motorist does not see you and collides with your bike, you may suffer serious injuries that require extensive medical care and years of rehabilitation. If you were injured in a blind spot accident, […]

Important Tips for Motorcycle Safety

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on December 28, 2017 in Motorcycle Accidents

Due to the lack of external protection, a motorcyclist who is involved in an accident may suffer serious injuries such as brain damage, paralysis, road rash and broken bones. Fortunately, there are many safety tips that riders can follow to help prevent serious injury. If you have been injured in a motorcycle accident, it is […]

Strategies to Prevent a Motorcycle Accident

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on October 10, 2017 in Motorcycle Accidents

There is nothing quite like hitting the road on a motorcycle. Unfortunately, this is one of the most dangerous ways to travel on our nation’s roadways. If you get into an accident, there is a high risk of suffering severe, life-threatening injuries. While there is nothing you can do to completely eliminate the risk of […]

What You Should Know About Pennsylvania’s Motorcycle Safety Laws

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on April 26, 2017 in Motorcycle Accidents

In order to ensure the safety of motorcyclists, Pennsylvania has created laws that operators and riders must follow when traveling on a motorcycle. If you or someone you love frequently enjoys riding on a motorcycle, it is important that you know and understand these laws to increase roadway safety and prevent serious motorcycle accidents in […]

Pennsylvania Governor Declares May Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on May 09, 2016 in Motorcycle Accidents

With numerous collisions involving motorcycles on Pennsylvania highways, the state’s governor declared May as Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month to ensure proper motorcycle training, reduce fatalities and provide motorists with safe driving tips when sharing the road with motorcyclists. In 2015, at least 3,400 motorcycle collisions were reported, along with 179 deaths. The number of fatalities […]

Mount Joy Man Dies After Pennsylvania Motorcycle Crash

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer Injury Lawyers on April 14, 2015 in Motorcycle Accidents

Posted on Apr 14, 2015 The Carlisle Sentinel and abc27 News in Harrisburg are reporting that a 19-year-old Mount Joy man was fatally injured in a crash involving two motorcycles this past Sunday afternoon in West Hempfield Township. According to the reports from the West Hempfield Township police, Jed Sweigart died at Lancaster General Hospital after […]

Free Case Review

No Upfront Fees

Name*
First
Email*
Phone*
Address*
ZIP / Postal Code
Tell us what happened*
CAPTCHA

Recent Results

$10,043,952.13 Personal Injury

Schmidt Kramer, P.C.partner Gerard C. Kramer won a personal injury action for $10,043,952.13 in Northumberland County on behalf of a volunteer firefighter who was the victim of Intentional Tort. The 50-year-old volunteer firefighter was seriously injured when a barn collapsed, causing a spinal injury which left him a paraplegic. The claim was brought against the arsonist who intentionally started the fire. It is believed that the verdict is the highest ever in Northumberland County.

Read more
$4,034,000.00 Personal Injury

Yesterday a Judge in Union County (Lewisburg, PA) awarded a couple from New Berlin, Pennsylvania, over $4,000,000 because the husband was shot while turkey hunting. You might ask yourself, how does a turkey hunting accident end up with that type of verdict? In order to understand the verdict you would have to know our clients. They are good people who had their life wrecked. Plus, you would have to know the defendant, who should not have been hunting with a gun because he was prohibited after a previous criminal conviction. It is a good verdict, because the Judge was able to do two things with his decision. First, he communicated to two very good people that their losses were something that those of us on the outside could appreciate and value. Mike Hobbins (our client) is a 51 year old guy who lost his sight because a convicted felon --who should not have even possessed a gun-- went hunting illegally, and broke with impunity the most fundamental rule in hunting: identify your target before you pull the trigger. The Judge accepted the financial loss Mr. Hobbins' suffered, but listened closely to the evidence of less tangible losses. When Mike broke down on the stand, because his daughter would end up walking him down the aisle at her wedding, as opposed to how it was supposed to go, the Judge was listening. When Mike could not keep it together, because of how emasculating it was for him not to be able to provide financially for his family, the Judge was listening. It was facts like these that the Judge cited to support the $2,000,000 award for non-economic damages. Second, the Judge wanted to send a message. Union County is a hunting county. Many of the residents hunt there, and people from outside the area come to Union County to hunt. It was my impression, from the Judge's statements as he rendered his decision, that he wanted to send a message to the people in Union County to protect them in their sport. The rules in place to restrict people convicted of crimes not to have a gun are not to be broken. Hunting is serious and you have to identify your target before you shoot. When you turn your back on the rules that are set to provide safety in a sport, you risk being an example. Here, the $1,000,000 punitive damage award sends that message loud and clear. When it really comes down to brass tacks, the right action was taken against a Defendant who may never truly appreciate what kind of impact his reckless choices caused. At Schmidt Kramer, we are injury lawyers. That means we work with people who were hurt in car accidents, who were hurt by the neglect of nursing homes, or those that were seriously injured because of the reckless, thoughtless acts of others. If you or a loved one have been injured in Pennsylvania, we may be able to help. While the verdict yesterday is not one that is representative of every case we do, it does show that serious and dedicated representation can bring good results. Joe Chapman January 18, 2013

Read more
$2,200,000.00 Auto Accidents

On Monday, January 6, 2014, Schmidt Kramer accident lawyer Scott Cooper obtained a verdict on behalf of his client who is the widow of a man who died in a fiery crash on Interstate 78 in Lebanon County. The awarded verdict of $2.2 million was in a nonjury proceeding before a federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. That verdict includes $100,000 in punitive damages assessed against the owner of the trucking company. Kamilah Claxton won summary judgment in November after the defendants, Sukhwinder Singh and the trucking company for which he worked, failed to file a brief in opposition to Claxton's motion, which was made in September. The verdict in Claxton v. Singh was issued after the court held a non-jury assessment of damages earlier this month. "Mr. Sukhchan Singh, the employer, is liable on the basis of respondent superior, but was also grossly negligent in failing to maintain his vehicle in compliance with state and federal law, particularly with regard to having required safety inspections and correcting defects in its braking equipment," said U.S. District Judge William W. Caldwell of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in his opinion accompanying the verdict. "He was also grossly negligent in entrusting his vehicle to Sukhwinder Singh, an inexperienced truck driver who had failed the written test and driving test multiple times before finally earning his commercial driving license," Caldwell said.

Read more
$1,200,000.00 Personal Injury

A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy. 2012-06-26 10:00:00 AM Date of Verdict: June 19. 2012 Court and Case No.: C.P. Dauphin County No. 2009-CV-14003-MM Judge: Scott Evans Type of Action: Medical malpractice Injuries: Anoxic brain injury Plaintiffs Counsel: Terry S. Hyman, Schmidt Kramer, Harrisburg Plaintiffs Experts: Dr. Anna H. Messner, liability; Lucille Packer, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Palo Alto, Calif.; Terry P. Leslie, vocations and earning capacity, Lancaster; Dr. Hilary B. Berlin, pediatric psychiatry, Great Neck, N.Y. Defense Counsel: Andrew H. Foulkrod, Darlene K. King, Foulkrod Ellis, Camp Hill, PA Defense Experts: James C. Reilly, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Wilmington, DE Comment: A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy. The entire verdict came against Dr. Andrew M. Shapiro, the doctor who plaintiffs Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Metz alleged chose to have the boy monitored at a pediatric ward. The plaintiffs argued Shapiro failed to tell nurses caring for the baby about, and how to care for, the boy's enhanced risk for respiratory failure. The jury came back on June 19 and awarded Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Mets $500,000 in non-economic damages and $686,170 in loss of future earning capacity, according to the plaintiffs counsel. According to the statement, the baby's mother brought him to Shapiro because she was "'afraid that he might stop breathing during his sleep,'" the plaintiffs' pretrial statement said. Shapiro performed a sleep study and observed the baby's Apnea Hypopnea Index to be 43 — four times higher than what's considered severe. A tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were performed. According to the plaintiffs, the baby's sleep study results put him at an increased risk for post-operative respiratory complications. Despite this, they argued in the statement, Shapiro ordered the pediatric nurses at the Harrisburg Hospital general pediatric ward to observe the boy as they would any other patients — about once every four hours. The pretrial statement said that one in four children who have an AHI in the 40s and oxygen desaturation below 80 have some type of respiratory problem. The younger the child, the greater the risk of a respiratory problem, the statement said. According to the statement, Shapiro took off the child's pulse oximeter, the finger-mounted device used to measure blood oxygen, and ordered a heart and respiratory rate monitor. The child was 11 months old at the time. The plaintiffs pled that the baby was last seen at 4 a.m. There was no record of his oxygen saturation for the next hour and 45 minutes. He stopped breathing a 6:40 a.m., and his brain was without oxygen long enough to cause demonstrable injury on an MRI. "Immediately prior to his surgery, [the child] was a normal child, who could say mama, eat finger foods, and was just on the verge of walking," the statement said. "After his code, [he] was like a newborn. He could not lift his head or sit up. He could not talk. He could not move." In his pretrial statement, Shapiro argued that he recognized the child's pre-operative sleep study showed he was driven to breath by decreased blood oxygen saturation, which he said was typical in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. He argued the American Academy of Otolaryngology dictates that admission to the intensive care unit is not the standard of care. In the statement, he said nurses did not observe signs of respiratory distress. No alarms sounded until the child arrested, the statement said. He said the baby likely arrested as a result of hypoglycemia and/or an acute aspiration, which he argued would not have been identified by blood oxygen saturation. — Ben Present, of the Law Weekly

Read more
$1,024,040.80 Auto Accidents

Scott Cooper settled a wrongful death case on behalf of the widow of a police office who was killed in a car accident in the line of duty for $1,024,040.80. The claim against the other driver was amicably resolved before suit was filed for the entire available policy limits for the other driver. The case took place in Adams County, PA.

Read more

Testimonials

Dennis Kergick helped me with my Workers' Compensation case. He was never intimidated by my employer and their unlawful tactics. He explained my options and how moving forward will affect me and my employment with my employer. He made himself available to answer any questions I had concerning my case, sometimes after regular business hours. Concerned about my wellbeing, Dennis followed up with me after surgeries and doctor visits and discussed prescribed plans of actions. Understanding just how important it is to have a steady income during such trying times, he kept the weekly benefits coming and on a regular basis. His personal level of compassion by itself made my recovery much easier. I can't imagine how difficult it would have been trying to navigate my case without him. I will recommend Schmidt Kramer to my friends and family or anyone facing a work-related injury. Thank You.
Jeff K., Workers' Compensation Client of Dennis Kergick from McClure, PA
Abbie was amazing. This was my first accident and she helped me feel less stressed because she handled everything. I would recommend her to any of my friends or family.
Michelle R., Auto Accident Client of Abbie Trone from New Cumberland, PA
I would highly recommend Dennis. He was very patient and very understanding with me, which meant a lot. Thanks for everything. I couldn't have gotten through this without you.
Melissa D., Workers' Compensation Client of Dennis Kergick from Chambersburg, PA
Scott Cooper has great interpersonal and communication skills. It was a pleasure working with him. The paralegals had everything ready for Scott, error-free. They were very polite and responsive. A great team to work with.
John P., Auto Accident Client of Scott Cooper from Halifax, PA
Michael did an excellent job. I was really satisfied with the way he handled my case.
Clarence L., Auto Accident Client of Mike Kosik from Harrisburg, PA