Car Accidents Blog Page 6 of 56

Big Pickup Trucks – the Hidden Dangers They Pose

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on February 27, 2023 in Car Accidents

Pickup trucks have always been popular with drivers who wanted to make use of their ability to carry cargo. For the first time ever, pickup trucks have outsold sedans in the U.S. market. With their increased popularity, there are more big pickup trucks than ever on the road today. However, these vehicles pose many hidden […]

Do I Have a Claim if a Police Car Hits My Vehicle?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on February 24, 2023 in Car Accidents

Police officers and other law enforcement personnel are typically protected by sovereign immunity. However, in Pennsylvania, even police officers can be held liable when a crash happens due to negligence. Schmidt Kramer talks about crashes with police cars and when the officers in these traffic incidents could be held liable for the damages. Even when […]

Who is Liable for a Crash Due to Improper Turn Signal Use

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on February 21, 2023 in Car Accidents

Far too many drivers either never use a turn signal at all or do not use it correctly. Yet studies show that improper turn signal use is a contributing factor in millions of crashes each year. This is mind-boggling when one thinks about how simple it is to use a turn signal. It also raises […]

Understanding Vision Loss and Other Eye Injuries After a Crash

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on February 15, 2023 in Car Accidents

Eye injuries from a crash are very common and could cause vision loss and other complications without medical attention. Unfortunately, the victims may not know what medical treatment or legal help could aid their recovery. Schmidt Kramer explains more about eye injuries that are typical in traffic accidents and what victims can do to […]

Lost Wages After a Crash – How Do I Get That Money Back?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on February 10, 2023 in Car Accidents

Traffic accidents are not always severe, but even when minor, the damages could be significant. The first thing people often think of is the costly medical treatments needed to aid their recovery. While not wrong, a victim’s lost wages after a crash could also be quite extensive. If a victim is unable to work for […]

Is Driving While Wearing Headphones Dangerous?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on February 03, 2023 in Car Accidents

There are many reasons you may want to use headphones while driving. However, in a lot of states, including Pennsylvania, it is illegal to do so. Even if it were not against the law, wearing headphones while driving is a dangerous idea. Schmidt Kramer discusses the use of headphones while behind the wheel and the […]

Are Pedestrians More Likely to Get Hit By Vehicles in Winter

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on January 27, 2023 in Car Accidents

People who frequently walk in areas where there is a heavier traffic flow are statistically more likely to get hit by a car. Learn why in winter these crash risks are greater, even for pedestrians in more rural areas. Schmidt Kramer discusses winter crashes involving pedestrians, including how you can protect yourself from becoming a […]

Are My Dental Injuries Covered in a Crash Claim?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on January 24, 2023 in Car Accidents

The impact of a crash may cause victims to fracture, knock out multiple teeth or worse. Sometimes these damages may even require surgical intervention. Yet dental injuries, which happen fairly often in collisions, are rarely talked about. Schmidt Kramer addresses this topic because dental injuries can be severe, disfiguring and expensive to treat. Victims with […]

Proving Fault for a Collision if Driver Statements Differ Greatly

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on January 20, 2023 in Car Accidents

After a crash, the drivers involved often have varying viewpoints about what happened. However, what if the differences in their statements are extreme? If you are the injured victim, how do you prove fault and establish negligence if driver accounts differ greatly? At Schmidt Kramer, we have seen “he said, she said” types of crashes […]

Burn Injuries From a Car Accident – Do I Have a Claim?

Posted on behalf of Schmidt Kramer on January 12, 2023 in Car Accidents

People who suffer severe burn injuries in a car accident are likely to experience extreme pain. Depending on the severity of the burn, these victims may also need surgery and further medical care. Although car fires are rare, there are many ways you could get burned in a crash. Learn more about burns from car […]

Free Case Review

No Upfront Fees

Recent Results

$10,043,952.13 Personal Injury
Schmidt Kramer, P.C.partner Gerard C. Kramer won a personal injury action for $10,043,952.13 in Northumberland County on behalf of a volunteer firefighter who was the victim of Intentional Tort. The 50-year-old volunteer firefighter was seriously injured when a barn collapsed, causing a spinal injury which left him a paraplegic. The claim was brought against the arsonist who intentionally started the fire. It is believed that the verdict is the highest ever in Northumberland County.
View Results
$4,034,000.00 Personal Injury
Yesterday a Judge in Union County (Lewisburg, PA) awarded a couple from New Berlin, Pennsylvania, over $4,000,000 because the husband was shot while turkey hunting.You might ask yourself, how does a turkey hunting accident end up with that type of verdict? In order to understand the verdict you would have to know our clients. They are good people who had their life wrecked. Plus, you would have to know the defendant, who should not have been hunting with a gun because he was prohibited after a previous criminal conviction.It is a good verdict, because the Judge was able to do two things with his decision. First, he communicated to two very good people that their losses were something that those of us on the outside could appreciate and value. Mike Hobbins (our client) is a 51 year old guy who lost his sight because a convicted felon --who should not have even possessed a gun-- went hunting illegally, and broke with impunity the most fundamental rule in hunting: identify your target before you pull the trigger. The Judge accepted the financial loss Mr. Hobbins' suffered, but listened closely to the evidence of less tangible losses. When Mike broke down on the stand, because his daughter would end up walking him down the aisle at her wedding, as opposed to how it was supposed to go, the Judge was listening. When Mike could not keep it together, because of how emasculating it was for him not to be able to provide financially for his family, the Judge was listening. It was facts like these that the Judge cited to support the $2,000,000 award for non-economic damages. Second, the Judge wanted to send a message. Union County is a hunting county. Many of the residents hunt there, and people from outside the area come to Union County to hunt. It was my impression, from the Judge's statements as he rendered his decision, that he wanted to send a message to the people in Union County to protect them in their sport. The rules in place to restrict people convicted of crimes not to have a gun are not to be broken. Hunting is serious and you have to identify your target before you shoot. When you turn your back on the rules that are set to provide safety in a sport, you risk being an example. Here, the $1,000,000 punitive damage award sends that message loud and clear.When it really comes down to brass tacks, the right action was taken against a Defendant who may never truly appreciate what kind of impact his reckless choices caused.At Schmidt Kramer, we are injury lawyers. That means we work with people who were hurt in car accidents, who were hurt by the neglect of nursing homes, or those that were seriously injured because of the reckless, thoughtless acts of others. If you or a loved one have been injured in Pennsylvania, we may be able to help. While the verdict yesterday is not one that is representative of every case we do, it does show that serious and dedicated representation can bring good results.Joe ChapmanJanuary 18, 2013
View Results
$2,200,000.00 Auto Accidents
On Monday, January 6, 2014, Schmidt Kramer accident lawyer Scott Cooper obtained a verdict on behalf of his client who is the widow of a man who died in a fiery crash on Interstate 78 in Lebanon County. The awarded verdict of $2.2 million was in a nonjury proceeding before a federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. That verdict includes $100,000 in punitive damages assessed against the owner of the trucking company.Kamilah Claxton won summary judgment in November after the defendants, Sukhwinder Singh and the trucking company for which he worked, failed to file a brief in opposition to Claxton's motion, which was made in September. The verdict in Claxton v. Singh was issued after the court held a non-jury assessment of damages earlier this month."Mr. Sukhchan Singh, the employer, is liable on the basis of respondent superior, but was also grossly negligent in failing to maintain his vehicle in compliance with state and federal law, particularly with regard to having required safety inspections and correcting defects in its braking equipment," said U.S. District Judge William W. Caldwell of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in his opinion accompanying the verdict."He was also grossly negligent in entrusting his vehicle to Sukhwinder Singh, an inexperienced truck driver who had failed the written test and driving test multiple times before finally earning his commercial driving license," Caldwell said.
View Results
$1,200,000.00 Personal Injury
A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.2012-06-26 10:00:00 AMDate of Verdict: June 19. 2012Court and Case No.: C.P. Dauphin County No. 2009-CV-14003-MMJudge: Scott EvansType of Action: Medical malpracticeInjuries: Anoxic brain injuryPlaintiffs Counsel: Terry S. Hyman, Schmidt Kramer, HarrisburgPlaintiffs Experts: Dr. Anna H. Messner, liability; Lucille Packer, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Palo Alto, Calif.; Terry P. Leslie, vocations and earning capacity, Lancaster; Dr. Hilary B. Berlin, pediatric psychiatry, Great Neck, N.Y.Defense Counsel: Andrew H. Foulkrod, Darlene K. King, Foulkrod Ellis, Camp Hill, PADefense Experts: James C. Reilly, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Wilmington, DEComment: A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.The entire verdict came against Dr. Andrew M. Shapiro, the doctor who plaintiffs Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Metz alleged chose to have the boy monitored at a pediatric ward. The plaintiffs argued Shapiro failed to tell nurses caring for the baby about, and how to care for, the boy's enhanced risk for respiratory failure.The jury came back on June 19 and awarded Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Mets $500,000 in non-economic damages and $686,170 in loss of future earning capacity, according to the plaintiffs counsel.According to the statement, the baby's mother brought him to Shapiro because she was "'afraid that he might stop breathing during his sleep,'" the plaintiffs' pretrial statement said. Shapiro performed a sleep study and observed the baby's Apnea Hypopnea Index to be 43 — four times higher than what's considered severe. A tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were performed.According to the plaintiffs, the baby's sleep study results put him at an increased risk for post-operative respiratory complications. Despite this, they argued in the statement, Shapiro ordered the pediatric nurses at the Harrisburg Hospital general pediatric ward to observe the boy as they would any other patients — about once every four hours.The pretrial statement said that one in four children who have an AHI in the 40s and oxygen desaturation below 80 have some type of respiratory problem. The younger the child, the greater the risk of a respiratory problem, the statement said.According to the statement, Shapiro took off the child's pulse oximeter, the finger-mounted device used to measure blood oxygen, and ordered a heart and respiratory rate monitor. The child was 11 months old at the time.The plaintiffs pled that the baby was last seen at 4 a.m. There was no record of his oxygen saturation for the next hour and 45 minutes. He stopped breathing a 6:40 a.m., and his brain was without oxygen long enough to cause demonstrable injury on an MRI."Immediately prior to his surgery, [the child] was a normal child, who could say mama, eat finger foods, and was just on the verge of walking," the statement said. "After his code, [he] was like a newborn. He could not lift his head or sit up. He could not talk. He could not move."In his pretrial statement, Shapiro argued that he recognized the child's pre-operative sleep study showed he was driven to breath by decreased blood oxygen saturation, which he said was typical in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.He argued the American Academy of Otolaryngology dictates that admission to the intensive care unit is not the standard of care. In the statement, he said nurses did not observe signs of respiratory distress. No alarms sounded until the child arrested, the statement said.He said the baby likely arrested as a result of hypoglycemia and/or an acute aspiration, which he argued would not have been identified by blood oxygen saturation.— Ben Present, of the Law Weekly
View Results
$1,024,040.80 Auto Accidents
Scott Cooper settled a wrongful death case on behalf of the widow of a police office who was killed in a car accident in the line of duty for $1,024,040.80. The claim against the other driver was amicably resolved before suit was filed for the entire available policy limits for the other driver. The case took place in Adams County, PA.
View Results

Testimonials

Greg W
Badreddine Saadoune
Michael Kosik was great, I couldn't have asked for a better lawyer. He worked to make sure my medical bills were adjusted appropriately to state law (since I was a victim) and worked hard to make sure I got an appropriate settlement. He is a very kind and understanding person who took the time to explain everything to me in great detail.
Darryl
Jessica Mitchell is lovely, she took care everything in a wonderful way. Definitely I would recommend her.
Mogart Febres
Abbie Trone!! I love her!! She’s amazing! She made everything easy. She was very nice to me! She took very care of my case & If need be i will use her again!!
Desiree Cannon