Linking Back Pain to a Harrisburg Car Crash

You may initially walk away from a car accident feeling fine, and then days later start to feel a sharp pain down your back. This is not uncommon, as initially shock and adrenaline block some degree of pain. As the shock wears off and inflammation from the crash increases in your body, what might have seemed like minor soreness to the back can get much worse. Unfortunately, crash victims who develop delayed injuries, especially for an internal injury, like severe back pain, can expect a lot of push back from the liable insurance company.

At Schmidt Kramer, our experienced Harrisburg car accident attorneys are ready to help you navigate the legal process. We encourage you to contact us as soon as your injuries have been stabilized, and we welcome questions you may have about your potential case. We are committed to holding at-fault parties accountable for their actions, and we know how to dispute insurance companies looking for reasons to devalue your back injury claim.

Call our firm today to request a FREE case review: (717) 727-2550

How Do I Prove My Back Pain Was Caused by My Harrisburg Car Accident?

Back pain is common after a car accident, but be prepared that the insurance company will likely work hard to dispute your claim. To protect your rights and your claim, you need to provide solid evidence that links your current back pain to the Harrisburg car crash that caused it.

These are some key steps to take immediately after your crash:

Seek Medical Care Immediately

Even if you feel fine, see a doctor within 24 hours. This creates a crucial medical record documenting your condition immediately after the crash. People who are truly injured do not wait to seek medical care.

during your examination, be sure to tell the ER doctor that you were involved in a car crash. This provides key information about what the impact may have done to your back. Mention any discomfort, stiffness, or unusual sensations, no matter how minor they seem. Those early symptoms are likely to feel a lot worse later.

Emergency room visits create the strongest initial documentation. ER doctors specifically look for trauma-related injuries and note them in your medical records. This creates hard-to-dispute evidence that helps to link your back pain to the crash that caused or exacerbated it.

Get Diagnostic Tests

The ER doctor treating you will likely request diagnostic testing to rule out more serious back injuries. All of this information gets added to your medical records, including the results of your tests and the diagnosis provided by your doctor.

X-rays show broken bones but miss soft tissue damage. Your back pain likely involves muscles, ligaments, or discs that do not appear on basic X-rays.

MRI scans reveal herniated discs, pinched nerves, and soft tissue inflammation. These detailed images can directly link your symptoms to specific anatomical damage. Schedule an MRI as soon as your doctor recommends it.

CT scans offer different angles and can detect injuries that MRIs may miss. Some doctors order both tests to get a complete picture of your spine’s condition.

Work With Spine Specialists

Your family doctor provides initial care, but specialists offer the expertise needed to prove causation. Orthopedic surgeons, neurologists, and pain management doctors understand spine mechanics.

These specialists can explain exactly how crash forces affected your specific vertebrae, discs, and surrounding tissues. They use medical terminology that carries authority in legal proceedings.

Gather Solid Documentation

The police report captures the basic facts of the accident, including the time, date, and those involved. You may need more detailed evidence about the crash.

Accident reconstruction experts examine evidence using a combination of scientific analysis and other software, such as photogrammetry software and 3-D scanners. They also use vehicle simulation software to interpret and calculate the forces your body experienced during impact. They consider vehicle weight, speed, angles, and specific impact points to determine the trauma your spine absorbed.

Document Your Pain and Limitations

Keep a daily pain journal starting immediately after your accident. Write down your pain levels, activities that worsen your symptoms, and how the injury affects your overall quality of your work and personal life.

You should also document the treatments, test results, and care recommendations as you receive them from your doctor. Save all medical bills, prescription receipts, and therapy appointments. These financial records prove the ongoing cost of your injury and show consistent treatment.

What Types of Back Injuries Are Common in Harrisburg Car Accidents?

Car accidents create unique forces that can damage your spine in multiple ways. Although crash victims may sustain various types of injuries, they must recognize the symptoms and seek proper treatment for these injuries.

Herniated Discs: This type of injury occurs when the gel-like center of the disc pushes through the outer ring. This puts pressure on nearby nerves, causing sharp pain that radiates down your legs.
Spinal Compression: An injury that happens when a crash forces your vertebrae together.
Lower Back Whiplash: While whiplash injuries often effect the neck and upper back, they can impact your lower back as well. Deep, aching pain that worsens with movement. You might feel stiff in the morning or experience spasms when changing positions. These symptoms can persist for months without proper treatment.
Facet Joint Injuries: This happens when the small joints connecting your vertebrae get jammed or stretched. These joints help control spinal movement, and damage creates persistent pain and stiffness.
Paraspinal Muscle Strains: A type of muscle strain that affects the long muscles running alongside your spine. These muscles work constantly to maintain posture and support movement. When damaged, simple activities like getting out of bed become painful.
Ligament Sprains: This occurs when the tough bands connecting your vertebrae stretch beyond their limits. Unlike muscles, ligaments heal slowly and may never regain full strength without proper treatment.
Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A syndrome that develops when muscle knots form after trauma. These trigger points create referred pain that spreads throughout your back and into your legs.

Can I Still Obtain Compensation if I Had Previous Back Pain?

Pre-existing injuries, including previous back injuries, do not disqualify you from receiving compensation after a Harrisburg car accident. Pennsylvania law protects your right to fair payment when crashes worsen existing conditions.

Pennsylvania’s “eggshell skull” rule requires at-fault drivers to pay for all injuries they cause, even when accidents worsen pre-existing conditions. Insurance companies cannot reduce your compensation simply because you had back problems before the crash.

However, it is still you and your attorney’s responsibility to provide the evidence needed to link your injuries to the accident. You must show how the accident made your pre-existing injuries worse.

How Long Do I Have to Report My Back Pain After a Harrisburg Car Accident?

You have exactly two years from your accident date to file a personal injury lawsuit in Pennsylvania. If you miss this deadline, you lose your right to compensation, regardless of how severe your injuries are.

Courts rarely grant extensions to this deadline. Even if you develop or discover pain or injuries weeks after the accident, the deadline is still the same. Do not assume you can wait until the last minute to decide whether to file a lawsuit. A strong case requires significant time and preparation, especially if you go to court.

Why Delayed Back Pain Treatment Hurts Your Harrisburg Car Accident Claim

When you delay your back pain treatment, it makes it difficult to link your injuries to the car crash. As a result, you may not have the proper documentation, and your words alone do not show the severity of your injuries.

Makes it Harder to Link Your Injuries to the Crash

The longer you wait to see a doctor, the harder it becomes to prove your back pain stems from the accident. Pre-existing conditions become more problematic with delayed treatment.

Can Reduce Settlement Outcomes

Claims with immediate medical treatment may settle for more than those with delayed care. Crash victims with delayed care may have to overcome the challenges of finding medical evidence that shows the initial state of their injuries.

Casts Serious Doubt on Your Credibility

Delayed treatment damages your credibility with insurance adjusters, attorneys, and potential juries. People expect genuinely injured individuals to seek immediate medical care.

Your pain complaints carry less weight when you wait weeks or months to see a doctor. Medical professionals and legal experts question the reliability of delayed symptom reporting.

Why Insurance Companies Question Back Pain Claims From Car Accidents

Your insurance company may question the severity of your back pain so they can lowball your claim. Recognize their tactics so that you can take the proper steps to secure maximum compensation.

Back Pain Is Not Visible Making it Harder To Prove

Unlike broken bones, which are visible on X-rays, back pain cannot be easily measured or photographed. Soft tissue injuries, muscle strains, and nerve damage can cause significant pain but often leave no visible evidence that satisfies insurance adjusters.

Pain scales rely on your reporting, which insurance companies dismiss as subjective and unreliable. They may argue that you could be exaggerating symptoms for financial gain.

Preexisting Medical History

Insurance companies immediately search your medical records for any previous back problems, no matter how minor. They will claim your current pain comes from age-related changes, old injuries, or degenerative conditions rather than the accident.

Delay Tactics Create Financial Pressure for Injured Victims

Insurance companies often deliberately prolong back pain claims through extensive documentation requests, multiple medical examinations, and repeated negotiations. They know mounting bills and lost wages force desperate people to accept lowball offers.

Initial settlement offers are typically 10 to 20 percent of the actual claim value. They expect most people to take inadequate amounts rather than continue fighting.

How Do I Receive Compensation for Back Pain After a Car Crash?

You will most likely recover compensation after an accident from the at-fault party’s insurance. If they are found to be liable for your injuries and damages, your claim can cover the following:

Medical Expenses: You can recover medical costs related to your back injury, including emergency room visits, doctor’s appointments, diagnostic tests such as MRIs and CT scans, prescription medication, and physical therapy sessions.
Future Treatment Costs: Chronic back injuries often require ongoing medical care. Your settlement should account for future expenses, including regular doctor visits, physical therapy, pain management treatments, and potential surgical procedures.
Lost Wages: Compensation covers the income lost while recovering from your back injury. This includes sick days, vacation time used for medical appointments, and time you could not work due to pain or treatment.
Pain and Suffering: This compensates for the physical discomfort, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life caused by your back injury. Pennsylvania allows recovery for both current and future pain and suffering.

Call Schmidt Kramer if You Need Assistance With Navigating Car Crash Claims

Do you have back pain after a car crash you did not cause? If so, we encourage you to seek legal help from our Harrisburg law firm today. Insurance companies count on victims giving up when pressured with complex medical evidence requirements and aggressive claim denial tactics.

At Schmidt Kramer, our attorneys have been helping injured crash victims for many years and have a proven history of securing favorable outcomes for our clients. When we manage your case, we work tirelessly to counter insurance company tactics and fight for the compensation you need and deserve. Call today for your free, no-risk case review. We take injury cases on contingency, so there are no upfront costs or out-of-pocket fees.

Call our trusted law firm to speak with a Schmidt Kramer attorney today: (717) 727-2550.

Free Case Review

No Upfront Fees

Testimonials

Solid, trustworthy and lucky to have on your side! Dennis Kergick represented me and I was very impressed. Finally a down to earth and easy to talk to attorney . When the time came he was a junk yard dog and I could see the opposing counsel was intimidated. All while maintaining a professional level of respect and courtesy. Would recommend to friends and family. Keep up the good work!!
It’s hard to believe it’s been four years already, but I’m still deeply thankful for my experience with Dennis. Now living in Illinois, I’ve had some similar encounters, and people here are often surprised — and even a bit shocked — when they hear my story. They always end up admitting just how good Dennis truly was. It’s something I didn’t fully realize at the time, but the more I share, the more it’s confirmed to me. God bless, and thank you I came back stronger than ever.
I wanted you to know that I'm so glad that I switched to Schmidt Kramer and that you are my Attorney. I think you are doing a great job for me, and wanted you to know that, A+++Thank you againKen
I can't thank Schmidt Kramer, P.C. enough for their dedication and hard work on my case. After my injury, dealing with the insurance company was overwhelming, but their team stepped in and fought tirelessly to ensure I got the benefits I needed for treatment. They kept me informed every step of the way and worked diligently to reach a fair settlement. Their professionalism, expertise, and compassion made all the difference. If you're looking for a personal injury firm that truly cares and delivers results, I highly recommend Schmidt Kramer, P.C.!
Erhan Yayla
Mike Kosik and his team were incredible. I cannot thank them enough for their hard work and dedication after taking on my case following an auto accident in April 2022 where a driver pulled out in front of me. I highly recommend them should you ever need a personal injury attorney. Thank you so much!

Recent Results

$10,043,952.13 Personal Injury
Schmidt Kramer, P.C.partner Gerard C. Kramer won a personal injury action for $10,043,952.13 in Northumberland County on behalf of a volunteer firefighter who was the victim of Intentional Tort. The 50-year-old volunteer firefighter was seriously injured when a barn collapsed, causing a spinal injury which left him a paraplegic. The claim was brought against the arsonist who intentionally started the fire. It is believed that the verdict is the highest ever in Northumberland County.
View Results
$4,034,000.00 Personal Injury
Yesterday a Judge in Union County (Lewisburg, PA) awarded a couple from New Berlin, Pennsylvania, over $4,000,000 because the husband was shot while turkey hunting.You might ask yourself, how does a turkey hunting accident end up with that type of verdict? In order to understand the verdict you would have to know our clients. They are good people who had their life wrecked. Plus, you would have to know the defendant, who should not have been hunting with a gun because he was prohibited after a previous criminal conviction.It is a good verdict, because the Judge was able to do two things with his decision. First, he communicated to two very good people that their losses were something that those of us on the outside could appreciate and value. Mike Hobbins (our client) is a 51 year old guy who lost his sight because a convicted felon --who should not have even possessed a gun-- went hunting illegally, and broke with impunity the most fundamental rule in hunting: identify your target before you pull the trigger. The Judge accepted the financial loss Mr. Hobbins' suffered, but listened closely to the evidence of less tangible losses. When Mike broke down on the stand, because his daughter would end up walking him down the aisle at her wedding, as opposed to how it was supposed to go, the Judge was listening. When Mike could not keep it together, because of how emasculating it was for him not to be able to provide financially for his family, the Judge was listening. It was facts like these that the Judge cited to support the $2,000,000 award for non-economic damages. Second, the Judge wanted to send a message. Union County is a hunting county. Many of the residents hunt there, and people from outside the area come to Union County to hunt. It was my impression, from the Judge's statements as he rendered his decision, that he wanted to send a message to the people in Union County to protect them in their sport. The rules in place to restrict people convicted of crimes not to have a gun are not to be broken. Hunting is serious and you have to identify your target before you shoot. When you turn your back on the rules that are set to provide safety in a sport, you risk being an example. Here, the $1,000,000 punitive damage award sends that message loud and clear.When it really comes down to brass tacks, the right action was taken against a Defendant who may never truly appreciate what kind of impact his reckless choices caused.At Schmidt Kramer, we are injury lawyers. That means we work with people who were hurt in car accidents, who were hurt by the neglect of nursing homes, or those that were seriously injured because of the reckless, thoughtless acts of others. If you or a loved one have been injured in Pennsylvania, we may be able to help. While the verdict yesterday is not one that is representative of every case we do, it does show that serious and dedicated representation can bring good results.Joe ChapmanJanuary 18, 2013
View Results
$2,200,000.00 Auto Accidents
On Monday, January 6, 2014, Schmidt Kramer accident lawyer Scott Cooper obtained a verdict on behalf of his client who is the widow of a man who died in a fiery crash on Interstate 78 in Lebanon County. The awarded verdict of $2.2 million was in a nonjury proceeding before a federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. That verdict includes $100,000 in punitive damages assessed against the owner of the trucking company.Kamilah Claxton won summary judgment in November after the defendants, Sukhwinder Singh and the trucking company for which he worked, failed to file a brief in opposition to Claxton's motion, which was made in September. The verdict in Claxton v. Singh was issued after the court held a non-jury assessment of damages earlier this month."Mr. Sukhchan Singh, the employer, is liable on the basis of respondent superior, but was also grossly negligent in failing to maintain his vehicle in compliance with state and federal law, particularly with regard to having required safety inspections and correcting defects in its braking equipment," said U.S. District Judge William W. Caldwell of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in his opinion accompanying the verdict."He was also grossly negligent in entrusting his vehicle to Sukhwinder Singh, an inexperienced truck driver who had failed the written test and driving test multiple times before finally earning his commercial driving license," Caldwell said.
View Results
$1,200,000.00 Personal Injury
A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.2012-06-26 10:00:00 AMDate of Verdict: June 19. 2012Court and Case No.: C.P. Dauphin County No. 2009-CV-14003-MMJudge: Scott EvansType of Action: Medical malpracticeInjuries: Anoxic brain injuryPlaintiffs Counsel: Terry S. Hyman, Schmidt Kramer, HarrisburgPlaintiffs Experts: Dr. Anna H. Messner, liability; Lucille Packer, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Palo Alto, Calif.; Terry P. Leslie, vocations and earning capacity, Lancaster; Dr. Hilary B. Berlin, pediatric psychiatry, Great Neck, N.Y.Defense Counsel: Andrew H. Foulkrod, Darlene K. King, Foulkrod Ellis, Camp Hill, PADefense Experts: James C. Reilly, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Wilmington, DEComment: A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.The entire verdict came against Dr. Andrew M. Shapiro, the doctor who plaintiffs Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Metz alleged chose to have the boy monitored at a pediatric ward. The plaintiffs argued Shapiro failed to tell nurses caring for the baby about, and how to care for, the boy's enhanced risk for respiratory failure.The jury came back on June 19 and awarded Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Mets $500,000 in non-economic damages and $686,170 in loss of future earning capacity, according to the plaintiffs counsel.According to the statement, the baby's mother brought him to Shapiro because she was "'afraid that he might stop breathing during his sleep,'" the plaintiffs' pretrial statement said. Shapiro performed a sleep study and observed the baby's Apnea Hypopnea Index to be 43 — four times higher than what's considered severe. A tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were performed.According to the plaintiffs, the baby's sleep study results put him at an increased risk for post-operative respiratory complications. Despite this, they argued in the statement, Shapiro ordered the pediatric nurses at the Harrisburg Hospital general pediatric ward to observe the boy as they would any other patients — about once every four hours.The pretrial statement said that one in four children who have an AHI in the 40s and oxygen desaturation below 80 have some type of respiratory problem. The younger the child, the greater the risk of a respiratory problem, the statement said.According to the statement, Shapiro took off the child's pulse oximeter, the finger-mounted device used to measure blood oxygen, and ordered a heart and respiratory rate monitor. The child was 11 months old at the time.The plaintiffs pled that the baby was last seen at 4 a.m. There was no record of his oxygen saturation for the next hour and 45 minutes. He stopped breathing a 6:40 a.m., and his brain was without oxygen long enough to cause demonstrable injury on an MRI."Immediately prior to his surgery, [the child] was a normal child, who could say mama, eat finger foods, and was just on the verge of walking," the statement said. "After his code, [he] was like a newborn. He could not lift his head or sit up. He could not talk. He could not move."In his pretrial statement, Shapiro argued that he recognized the child's pre-operative sleep study showed he was driven to breath by decreased blood oxygen saturation, which he said was typical in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.He argued the American Academy of Otolaryngology dictates that admission to the intensive care unit is not the standard of care. In the statement, he said nurses did not observe signs of respiratory distress. No alarms sounded until the child arrested, the statement said.He said the baby likely arrested as a result of hypoglycemia and/or an acute aspiration, which he argued would not have been identified by blood oxygen saturation.— Ben Present, of the Law Weekly
View Results
$1,024,040.80 Auto Accidents
Scott Cooper settled a wrongful death case on behalf of the widow of a police office who was killed in a car accident in the line of duty for $1,024,040.80. The claim against the other driver was amicably resolved before suit was filed for the entire available policy limits for the other driver. The case took place in Adams County, PA.
View Results

Challenges of Linking Back Pain to a Harrisburg Car Crash

Table of Contents